2016年6月30日星期四

LONG FASTS: DANGEROUS OR BENEFICIAL?

Long-term fasting can take several different forms. The most extreme is a “dry fast,” consuming nothing at all (food or water). This is definitely not advisable, as it’s very dangerous to go for more than a day or so without drinking. Water fasting means drinking only water, but consuming no calories during the fast. Another technique is juice fasting, or consuming only fruit and vegetable juices. Some people also fast on broth, or extremely low-calorie protein mixes.
Juice fasting and bone broth fasting aren’t truly fasts, since they do involve some intake of calories and nutrients. And protein fasts can be downright dangerous, since humans just weren’t built to live on protein with no accompanying fat. This article focuses on water fasting: the benefits, the drawbacks, and precautions to take if you do decide to start a longer fast.

Long Fasts and Weight Loss

The most obvious and best-researched benefits of longer fasts are for weight loss: if you’re not eating anything, weight will drop off your body fairly quickly. During the first 24 hours or so, you go through all the glycogen in your liver. After that, your body needs to run on what it has stored, either protein or fat.
For the first few days, weight loss averages around 1-2 pounds a day, both because you’re shedding water weight and because you’re using more protein. But consuming protein for fuel is risky, because it means breaking down muscles – not only your biceps, but also more essential muscles like your heart. This makes fat by far a preferential energy source, so after a few days, your body turns to its stored fat reserves for energy (ketosis). Since fat is more energy-dense per pound than protein, weight loss during this phase slows down to a more reasonable but still rapid pace of a little over 1 pound every 2 days.
Essentially, then, a long fast is a way of staying in ketosis for an extended period of time, but forcing your body to rely entirely on its own fat stores instead of dietary fat intake. Being in ketosis makes for fairly easy weight loss, since it suppresses hunger (once you get through the first few days, which are always rough). Fasting also allows you to completely get your mind off food, instead of always thinking about what you’re going to eat next and worrying about whether or not you’re eating too much.
Long fasting is an effective way to lose a lot of weight quickly, but with a significant caveat: many people proceed to gain it all back again, because they just go back to their old obesogenic diet right afterwards. Like any other “crash diet,” fasting will help you lose weight, but won’t help you keep it off unless you also make a long-term change in your diet after the fast is over. One study in obese patients who lost weight during 2 weeks of fasting found that 50% of their 46 patients either did not respond to the hospital’s attempts to contact them (which the researchers took as a sign they’d regained the weight) or responded saying they’d regained all the lost weight after 2 years.

Long Fasts: Other Benefits

In addition to weight loss, fasting also promotes autophagy, which is like a “spring cleaning” for your cells. Since your body is essentially eating itself, it has a chance to get rid of any junk or waste material that may have built up, and repair the damage of oxidative stress. This is one of the biggest benefits of fasting even for people who are already at a healthy weight, since it has powerful anti-aging and muscle-building properties.
One study also found that an extended fast (10 days on average) was beneficial to patients with hypertension, also noting that even though the patients didn’t embark on the fast to lose weight, all of them did – average weight loss was around 15 pounds. Longer term fasting (up to 5 days) may also have some benefits for chemotherapy patients.
Another benefit of extended fasting is purely mental: for many fasters, it’s a way to “re-set” their relationship with food, break free from patterns of emotional eating, or start fresh at the end of the fast. Fasting is part of many religious and spiritual practices because of its value for meditation and mindfulness. Bear in mind that this doesn’t happen automatically: it requires a high level of self-awareness and effort on the part of the faster. It’s a very useful tool, but it’s not a miracle cure.

Long Fasts: Dangers and Drawbacks

The ultimate risk of fasting, of course, is death by starvation; this doesn’t usually happen to people fasting for medical reasons, but taking anything to extremes is perilous. In Ireland in 1981, for example, 10 political prisoners starved themselves to death in a hunger strike against the British government, fasting between 46 and 73 days before they died.
Even fasts of a few weeks or less can have dangerous consequences. Fasting puts two different types of stress on your heart. First, it cannibalizes cardiac muscle for fuel. The human body does everything it can to conserve muscle during a fast, but inevitably some muscle will be sacrificed at the beginning of the fast. After a few days, the body switches over to using fat, but researchers have discovered that protein (muscle) utilization actually increases again later on, even though fat stores are still available. This protein includes the muscle in your heart: weaken this too much, and heart failure will result.
Strict water fasting is also a risk for heart failure because during a fast, the body’s intracellular stores of minerals vital for cardiac function, like magnesium and potassium, are depleted, even though serum levels remain normal. The results of this cardiac muscle loss and mineral deprivation can be tragic. During the 1950s and 60s, fasting was used as an experimental treatment for obesity, and several patients died (many from heart failure). Other reports of people dying during long fasts include more cases of heart failure. More recently, in 2010, a woman in Florida died after 21 days of fasting.
Other fasters die of infectious diseases that they simply don’t have the energy to fight off without adequate nutrition. In 1978, for example, a man named William Carlton died of pneumonia at a fasting center after fasting for 29 days in an attempt to cure his ulcerative colitis. He was 49 years old, and in normal health other than the colitis. Worldwide, infectious diseases are actually the most common cause of death among starving people, because an immune system weakened by malnutrition tends to give in before heart problems start to show. This is particularly common among children who go on (or are forced to go on) long fasts.
Of course, many people also fast safely, but it’s worth noting that fasting isn’t a risk-free experiment. Less serious drawbacks also include intense mood swings, low energy, and irritability. Fasting lowers blood pressure, so you may feel weak, dizzy, or nauseous during the fast. It raises levels of the stress hormones norepinephrine and cortisol, probably an adaptation to give you more energy for finding food, but not beneficial for optimum health.
Another potential downside of long-term fasting is the rate of detox. Fat is your body’s storage organ for everything, including any toxins that may have accumulated over the years. When you lose weight, all these toxins have to be removed through your bloodstream, which can be extremely uncomfortable. During fasting, these symptoms are even more pronounced, since the rate of fat burning is so rapid – many people feel nauseous, sick, or otherwise unwell.
Detox is sometimes a necessary evil, but when you’re thinking about the potential dangers of long-term fasting, make sure not to get taken in by fanatical advocates who claim that everything is just another detox symptom. Sometimes it’s actually a symptom of a bigger problem, not just detox, and even rapid detox can be unhealthy in itself.
There’s also a darker side to the mental health benefits of fasting. For eating disordered people, fasting can quickly turn into another form of abuse (punishment for eating too much or anything “wrong.”) Because fasting is often accompanied by a strange kind of energy, it’s possible to get addicted to it, and ignore physical danger in pursuit of that “fasting high.” This is just as dangerous as any other form of chronic malnutrition and starvation.

Long Fasts: Case Reports

In humans, most of the studies on fasting have dealt with religious fasts, which are more like intermittent fasting (for example, during the month of Ramadan, observant Muslims may not eat or drink while the sun is up, but observers commonly do eat dinner after sundown, and sometimes a small “breakfast” before sunrise as well. These studies tell us a lot about the benefits of intermittent fasting, but not much about long-term water fasts. There haven’t been a lot of high-quality studies on long-term water fasting, since mainstream medicine regards it as very dangerous. There are a few case studies which are interesting, but difficult to draw conclusions from:
One study tracked an anonymous monk who undertook a 40-day fast, with no caloric intake at all except from taking communion, which the researchers estimated at 60 calories per day. After thoroughly measuring every baseline of health before the man started fasting, the researchers took daily and weekly measurements until day 36. During this time, the man:
  • Lost around 34.5 pounds
  • Developed symptoms of severe hypotension (blood pressure that’s lower than normal), to the point where he needed almost half an hour just to stand up in the morning.
  • Showed no major changes in serum potassium, magnesium, calcium, or phosphorous (although this isn’t a sign of mineral sufficiency; see the section on breaking the fast and refeeding syndrome below)
  • Showed a slight rise in serum zinc
  • Showed increased levels of uric acid for the first two weeks. Uric acid stabilized in the third week, and then normalized after that.
The man had originally planned to fast for 40 days, but stopped on day 36, when “profound weakness and symptoms of postural hypotension interfered with his daily activities in the monastery.”
One reporter from Harper’s Magazine lost 30 pounds on a 17-day fast, and suggested that fasting is so denigrated as a cure for chronic disease because it’s just not profitable for drug companies. His article also detailed the case of a suicidal doctor after the Civil War who tried to starve himself to death, only to find that the longer he fasted, the better he felt.
An extremely obese man in Scotland lost 276 pounds on a 382-day fast, while taking supplemental vitamins and minerals. A rarity among extreme weight loss patients, he actually kept the weight off once the fast was over.
One follower of the Perfect Health Diet fasted for 30 days, and reported that his migraines were cured at the end of the fast. However, he later discovered that just eating a ketogenic diet would have the same effect.
Perhaps most usefully to anyone considering a long fast, a blogger named Celestine Chua fasted for 21 days and kept an astonishingly detailed record of her physical and emotional reactions. Although she experienced severe mental and physical “detox,” she reported being glad that she’d fasted, and having a better relationship with food afterwards.
All these reports are biased, of course, because people who try a fast and fail are much less likely to write publicly about it. But they are interesting resources, and we’re not likely to get a randomized, controlled clinical study any time soon, so they’re the best we have for now.
Long Fasts vs. Shorter Fasts
With any dietary intervention, you want to get the most gain for the least amount of pain. Especially considering that the benefits of intermittent fasting (as opposed to longer fasts) are so well attested, it’s worth a look to see if shorter fasts aren’t a better idea overall.
So are long or short fasts superior? The answer is that it depends on whyyou’re fasting. You can get the physical benefits of longer fasts just as easily from intermittent fasting, or even from not fasting at all. Ketosis, for example, doesn’t require any calorie restriction, only carbohydrate restriction. Since a ketogenic diet includes all the vitamins and nutrients your body needs to keep functioning, it’s much less dangerous and easier to just eat ketogenic meals than to enter ketosis by fasting.
Autophagy is also achievable through intermittent fasting just as easily as longer fasts. Autophagy begins when liver glycogen is depleted, around 12-16 hours into a fast. The rate of autophagy peaks there, and then drops after about 2 days. If your goal is a “spring cleaning” for your cells, intermittent fasting may be even more effective, since you spend more time in the “early fasting” period when autophagy is at its peak.
Long fasts also lose points for the social aspect – it’s easy to plan family meals around an 8-hour feeding window, but much more difficult to stay engaged in a healthy social life if you’re avoiding food altogether.
Intermittent fasting also reduces many of the drawbacks of long fast. There’s typically no loss of lean tissue (muscle), since people who IF eat plenty of protein, just at different times. Intermittent fasting allows you to keep working out, while exercising during long fasts will just cause more muscle loss. There’s much less risk of malnutrition, heart failure, and infectious complications with intermittent fasting – from a physical perspective, it’s hard to see how anyone would prefer an extended water fast.
On the other hand, there are some emotional and psychological benefits of longer fasts that intermittent fasting just doesn’t provide. A 2 or 3 week fast can be a springboard for a radical change in dietary habits – fasters report that abstaining from food completely gave them a valuable chance to re-evaluate their eating habits. For example, even emotional eating of ketogenic or otherwise healthy foods doesn’t break you out of the cycle of eating to deal with uncomfortable feelings. A total fast forces you to find other ways of handling these emotions. This can make a fast very difficult, but also very rewarding for people who can stick it out.
On the whole, intermittent fasting is superior for physical health (the same gain with less risk), but longer fasting may be superior for emotional, psychological, or spiritual reasons.

Long Fasts: Precautions

If you do decide to embark on a long fast, some common-sense precautions can prevent prevent a disappointing failure – or worse, a trip to the emergency room. Some people simply shouldn’t practice extended fasts, period:
  • Young children are still growing rapidly and need adequate nutrition at every stage to make sure their bodies develop properly
  • Very elderly people often don’t have the physical resources to fast safely.
  • People who are seriously ill, or people with chronic heart or kidney conditions, shouldn’t fast since their bodies may not be able to withstand the stress of fasting.
  • Women who are pregnant, or trying to get pregnant, should eat plenty of nutrient-dense food, because a well-fed state is essential for healthy reproduction.
If you’re not in any of these groups, make sure to do your own research and have a plan beforehand. Read up on other people’s experiences with long fasts, so you understand what you’re getting into. Think about your physical and emotional relationship with food – what do you think will be the difficulties of fasting for you, and how will you overcome them? Are there any specific issues that you want to meditate on or work through while you’re fasting?
A useful fasting plan should also include a plan for dealing with other people during your fast. Unless you live alone, chances are good that someone will notice and be concerned. How will you reassure them that you’re not anorexic or starving yourself? What if you have to participate in a business lunch or another work meeting involving food?
Also, make a backup plan while you’re well-fed and healthy for what you’ll do if the fast isn’t going well. During a long fast, it’s normal to experience crazy emotional highs and lows; this can prevent you from making a rational decision about whether or not you want to continue. Write down your criteria for what will make you stop the fast (“I will stop fasting if my blood pressure drops below _____________” or “I will stop fasting if I lose __________ pounds” or whatever it might be for you) and stick to them during your fast.
An even better option is to find someone to supervise your fast. If at all possible, it’s wise to fast under the care of a doctor, but this isn’t always an option, since most mainstream doctors have a knee-jerk negative reaction towards fasting. Even a close friend with no medical training can help provide some valuable perspective on how the fast is going. Fasting centers are another option, but these also aren’t without their problems: some of the fasting experts who run them have been implicated in very sketchy practices, and it’s crucial to do a lot of research before entrusting yourself to them.
During your fast, make sure to drink plenty of water to avoid dehydration, and take supplemental electrolytes: sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphate, and magnesium. Your body needs these minerals to balance fluid levels, and supplementing also prevents one of the chief dangers of fasting: refeeding syndrome (see the section on breaking your fast below). Normally, you get those minerals from your food; since you’re continuing to drink water without eating anything, you need them from an alternate source during your fast. You can buy “electrolyte water” (make sure you don’t get sports drinks full of artificial flavorings, though), make your own with water, lemon, and a pinch of salt, or take supplements.
While you’re in the midst of a fast, don’t try to work out at all – this will just cause your body to lose more muscle than necessary. The closer you can get to bed rest, the better. Read, journal, meditate, sleep, listen to music, or talk to people you love. Many people take time off work to concentrate on their fast. Keeping a slow-paced and thoughtful environment will help you really get the most of the psychological and spiritual benefits of fasting.

Breaking a Fast

Breaking the fast correctly is one of the most important ways to prevent any negative consequences. Introducing too much food too rapidly can lead to a fatal condition called refeeding syndrome. A sudden shift from ketosis (fat-adapted metabolism) to carbohydrate-based foods causes your body to release a flood of insulin to digest all those carbs, a process that requires large amounts of phosphate, potassium, magnesium, and several vitamins, especially thiamine (Vitamin B1). If you’ve been fasting for any length of time, though, these nutrients are severely depleted, so suddenly needing a lot of them leads to serious acute deficiencies, causing heart failure, hypotension, and sudden death.
set of guidelines from Scarborough Hospital in the UK for avoiding refeeding syndrome include:
  • Start slow: 10 calories/kilogram of body weight per day (or 5 calories/kilogram if you’ve been fasting longer than 15 days), with a daily increase of 5 calories/kilogram.
  • Supplement with thiamine and other B vitamins 30 minutes before breaking the fast (the guidelines are meant for hospitals and suggest an IV; another article gives an appropriate dose as 50-250mg).
  • Supplement with phosphorous, potassium, magnesium, and sodium before breaking the fast.
Additional guidelines include:
  • Supplement with electrolytes during the fast, as discussed above.
  • Break your fast with bone broth or diluted fruit juice, both rich in electrolytes. Squeeze your own juice, or if you buy some at the store, make sure it’s pure juice, with no sugar or other nasty additives involved.
  • The longer you fast, the longer you’ll need to spend breaking the fast; for anything longer than a week, plan on spending several days slowly reintroducing your body to solid foods.
Eat small portions, more often, and eat slowly. As your body starts to get more used to food again, pureed soups (like sweet potato lime soupcream of tomato soup, or butternut squash soup) are a good transition food. Avocados are soft and easy to digest, and a good source of healthy fats. A bone broth soup with egg yolks and some well-cooked vegetables is loaded with nutrients, fat, and protein. Fruit is often recommended as a transition food, but this isn’t a great idea because the fructose can be hard on your gut.
As you slowly work your way up to eating normally, make sure to re-introduce foods slowly and carefully. If you’ve never done an elimination diet before, this is a great opportunity to do so: try testing nightshades, nuts, or FODMAPs separately to see whether or not you have any reaction to them.

The Upshot

Water fasting is definitely an intriguing idea. Humans certainly have the ability to endure long periods of famine, but that doesn’t mean it’s healthy. So far, there’s some substantial evidence showing benefits for weight loss, but whether this weight loss is actually sustainable in the long term remains to be proven. And in most cases, you can get all the physical benefits of water fasting from intermittent fasting or even just a ketogenic diet, without all the attendant risks of completely abstaining from food for several weeks at a time. So for purely physical health reasons, longer fasts aren’t great because they have increased dangers without any increased benefits.
For the vast majority of people, it’s a much better idea to use intermittent fasting or alternate-day fasting (24 hours of feeding followed by 24 hours of fasting) and perhaps a ketogenic diet to reap the physical benefits of food restriction, without the very real dangers of longer fasts.  For mental health and spiritual practice, on the other hand, longer fasts do have some advantages over intermittent fasting. Whether the benefits outweigh the risks is a decision everyone has to make individually – don’t take the dangers lightly, and make sure to do your own research before you make your choice.

2016年6月29日星期三

Fasting Q&As, Answered

Q1. Is there an age limit for fasting?

No, no age limit.

Q2. What is the youngest and oldest age one can fast?

There are no limits.  If one is alive, they would benefit from fasting.  Our oldest client turned 91 while fasting with us, and our youngest was 2.5.  The 91 year old suffered from cancer of the larynx and showed up with a tumor in his throat so large it was painful to swallow, breathe, or speak.  He fasted 32 days and when he returned home after 6 weeks, they rushed him to the hospital expecting to find that the tumor was much larger and threatening his life, and planned to do an emergency tracheotomy. They could not find a tumor.

The youngest client was born with a heart defect and had already had open heart surgery twice, and had been on medication his entire life.  He showed up with his parents, very close friends of mine, for a visit from Europe and got off the plane very sick: fever, congestion, etc.  He fasted five days (he was only 30 pounds,) felt better than ever, and needed no medication for 4 months after.

Q3. I’m physically active, exercise several times a week and work at an office job. Can I continue my daily routine during a fast?

No!  Fasting is about giving the body complete physiological rest. Ideally, you would do absolutely nothing while fasting, because the more active you are, the more muscle your body will consume, and the less benefit you will get from the process. The whole point is to rest as much as possible so that the body can put all of it’s energy into cleansing and healing, processes that require a lot of energy, and for which the energy does not exist when living our normal lives.

Q4. If not, are there any alternatives where I can detox my system and maintain my daily routine?

Yes, you can eat a simple diet of mono-fruit meals, ie, only watermelon at one meal, only oranges at another.  Only whole, juicy, ripe fruit, and only one at a time.

Q5. Are there any benefits to a short-term fasting (1 day, or 3 days) or will it be a waste of time?

It takes the body between 3 and 4 days to get into the deepest part of a fast.  

Fasting for anything less than that provides only a surface level benefit, no real deep cleansing.

Furthermore, each time we begin a fast, we go through a stage of the process where there is a larger percentage of muscle consumed (technically, converted to sugar through gluconeogenesis) to feed the body. 

Consuming muscle with no real deep benefit makes no sense to me, so I wouldn’t recommend shorter fasts, unless the body is calling for it.  The french philosopher Voltaire said, “instead of medicine, fast for a day,” and if you wake up with acute symptoms, the smartest thing to do would be to call in sick, stay in bed, and rest as completely as possible consuming nothing but pure water.  If you feel better in one or two days, you can get up and eat again, having completed a short fast because your body was calling for it.

Q6. Is there an ideal length of time to fast for?

Most bodies are both very toxic from living in a toxic environment and from making poor choices around diet (and other consumables,) and chronically dehydrated. 

Getting the body really clean via water-only fasting is the most efficient and effective way to remedy these two critical issues, (it’s almost impossible to get well-hydrated while carrying a load of toxins throughout the body and old, hardened wastes in the colon.)  The longer one fasts, the more successfully they can remove these two primary impediments to feeling and functioning as well as possible.  We regularly fast people up to 42 days, and the average person has at least 42 days worth of reserves, more if they happen to be wealthy in nutrient reserves.  Please note that fasting more than 1 week on one’s own can be very dangerous and is never recommended.

Q7. What are the things one should do to ensure a safe fast and reap the maximum healing benefits of fasting?

First fast only with proper, experienced supervision.  This does not include medical professionals who generally have no knowledge or experience of what is and is not OK while fasting.  Second, rest as completely as possible.  The whole point of not eating is to liberate energy so that the body can use it for cleansing and healing.  If one is not taking in fuel, but is going about their normal life, they will be wasting precious energy now not available for cleansing and healing.  

Doing anything unnecessary while fasting is dangerous and counterproductive.  The ideal is to lie down and close your eyes as much as possible.  Sitting in front of a computer or a television is very enervating, and very counterproductive.

Q8. Are there any long-term side effects with fasting?

There are many effects of fasting, all positive.  However, whether they are long-term or short-term depends on the choices one makes after the fast.  Fasting is like a giant reset button, but to maintain the amazing benefits that accrue by fasting properly (resting as much as possible) one must continue to make excellent lifestyle choices after the fast.

Q9. I’ve read that ketosis is bad for the kidneys. Is it true?

Normally, when the body is in ketosis, there is a problem.  However, like every other species on the planet (all of whom fast when sick or badly injured enough,) the body is designed to fast safely by going into ketosis and using ketones (breakdown products of fat metabolism) instead of glucose to run the body.

During Fasting:

Q9. During my fast, I have strong headaches. Is this normal and why does it happen?

There are many reasons that this could happen.  If you are not consuming enough water, you might have a headache.  (the headache that accompanies a hangover is caused by dehydration).

But headaches also appear as a result of pressure and activity in the sinuses, as a result of man-made toxins crossing the blood-brain barrier, and from several other possible sources.

Headaches are not unusual while fasting. It’s important to understand that all symptoms are evidence that the body is cleansing or healing, and that the best we can do is to insure that we are safe while we get out of the way and let the body do what it needs to do.

Q10. Should I do water fasting with flushes for the digestive tract (e.g. salt water flushes) or enemas? If so, which ones do you recommend?

No, I do not recommend these flushes.  

Salt is a toxic inorganic mineral which raises blood pressure and causes the body to retain excess water to dilute the toxic salt.  Other flushes involve consuming other toxic substances to try to force the body to react in a beneficial way.  Enemas flush out beneficial bacteria and change the pH of the colon.  Ideally, we simply relax and wait, eliminating when the body is ready to.  This sometimes happens while fasting, and usually occurs between 3-5 days after starting to refeed again (if refeeding properly.)  Like every other living organism, the body is completely self-healing and self-cleansing and does not need us to direct it in any way. Rather, we simply need to get out of the way and allow the body to do what it needs to do.

Q11. Should I take a multi-vitamin during a fast?

No, and in fact, if you do, you are not actually fasting and are putting yourself in potential danger, as well as exacerbating existing issues.  Much of the benefit of fasting accrues as a result of the physiological changes that result in the complete absence of nutrients and calories coming in.  When we consume nutrients or calories of any kind, we are not fasting, and we do not get nearly the same benefit.  Without moving into the specific adaptations to the fasting state, you could put your body in serious danger of starving by consuming nutrients with few if any calories.  Furthermore, I would virtually never recommend using supplements at any time as you will train the body to become less able to assimilate what it needs from food, instead, learning to rely on the supplements.

Q12. Is it okay to chew sugarless gum or use a mouth spray while fasting? (To combat breath odor)

No, it is never a good idea to chew gum or use mouth spray, fasting or not.  While fasting, again you will be consuming calories and forcing the body to secrete enzymes on an ongoing basis as a result of chewing gum, making the body work harder than it needs to and wasting precious resources and reserves.

Mouth sprays are toxic.  Your bad breath is the result of the elimination of toxins from your body and will shift as your body gets clean.

Q13. Is it possible to build muscle by exercising while fasting?

No.  Fasting without injuring the body requires complete rest.

As the need for calories increases (by exercising, for instance) the body will consume more muscle as it is a more efficient source of fuel than fat.  Every other species on the planet will lie down and not move while fasting to conserve their precious reserves and not injure themselves. We can’t improve on nature and would do well to follow suit.  

Fortunately, though one will usually feel weak while fasting, that is because of the presence of toxins in the body and if we rest as completely as possible, we will actually lose very little muscle on a several week fast, and once we are finished, if we refeed properly, our newly efficient body will rebuild muscle fairly quickly.

Q14. I read that even when one enters ketosis stage, the body is still burning muscle, just that it’s a much lower portion (about 5-10% or so) compared to fats (all the rest). Is it true?

Yes it’s true the body is always converting some muscle to sugar while fasting, and the more active one is, the more muscle is consumed. Without resting completely, it is possible to really hurt yourself.

Post Fast:

Q15. How should one break a fast? I read that we should start with the most easily digestible foods, working from fruit juices, to fruits, to vegetables, and cooked food if one consumes cooked food.

I (personally) do not use juices unless someone is physically too weak to eat solid food (and this has happened no more than a few times in 15 years). Juices are fragmented, unnatural foods, and fruit, carrot and beet juices contain lots of sugar with no fiber to slow down the absorption of that sugar into the blood stream, causing a rapid rise in blood sugar.  By not consuming the whole food we are losing the benefit of any nutrients which may be bound up in the fiber…and that could be a significant amount, given that only about 5-10% of all plant nutrients have even been identified yet.

Additionally, because most people have quite a bit of old waste in the system, they need the fiber to begin eliminating this old material which prevents them from both assimilating properly and ever becoming properly hydrated.

Here’s what I have been doing for the last 10 years or so, after determining what worked best for most of my guests:

Day 1: 2 ozs of watermelon or papaya every two hours from 10 am to 6pm. Choose one fruit for the whole day.

Day 2: 4 ozs of watermelon every 2.5 hours from 9am to 7pm.

Day 3: Depending on how you did on day 2, between 6 and 8 ozs of watermelon, papaya, cantaloupe, or other melon every 3 hours from 9 to 6.

Days 4-7: Increase quantity by about 4 ozs or so each day, eating 4 times between 9 and 6 (every 3 hours.)  You can add one acid meal per day starting day 4 if you feel up to it. (Celes: Acid meal means food that are acidic in nature, including meat, diary, french fries, highly acidic fruits, etc. Refer to this table on heartburn food.)

Day 8 and beyond: Whole, ripe organic fruits and simple green salads.  Nothing dehydrated, very little fat.

You may want to substitute other fruits if you can’t get watermelon or papaya now.  

In fact, if you are not in a warm climate, I would not necessarily recommend watermelon at this time of year (Feb).  

You can use apples, pears, or other juicy fruits as well.  The idea is to very slowly increase your food quantity to jump-start the appetite and to encourage your metabolism to stay as low as possible, making your system as efficient as you can.

When you begin to eat, you want to stop drinking 30 minutes before each meal, and wait 45 after.  This will mean only about 30 minutes to drink that first day, and you will basically need to spend your day drinking, eating, and resting in-between.  
By about the third day, you might be ready for some very light exercise, increasing it slowly each day thereafter.  Be careful about not overdoing it too quickly.  

There’s no rush and you don’t want to set yourself back.

Q16. I’ve read that many fasters regain their weight post-fasting, and then some. If weight-loss is one of the objectives of fasting, how can one keep the weight off post-fast?

It is critically important that we refeed properly, continuing rest for at least the first couple of days (or much longer if reserves have been seriously depleted due to the length of the fast or the small amount that the faster started with.)  It is also important that we increase our caloric intake slowly over the course of the first week (or longer, depending on the length of the fast.) 

Finally, it is important that we make excellent diet and lifestyle choices after the fast to maintain the gains.

Q17. Is there a recommended frequency one should fast for? (i.e. once a year, once every 2 years?) Is it safe to do a long fast (3 weeks+) after 3-4 months of doing a 3-week fast?

My clients seem to benefit by doing three or four fasts of 3 weeks or more over the course of a few years.  If making excellent diet and lifestyle choices, it may not be necessary to fast much more beyond this, save a “maintenance fast” every five years or so.  The point is to use fasting to allow the body to eliminate old toxic waste and debris, heal anything that needs healing, and ultimately, set the stage for proper hydration, then to make the choices that allow one to continue functioning at the highest level possible.

How often someone can safely fast depends on how long the fast is for, and how much excess fat they are starting with.  There are truly no formulas and anyone would be well-served to consult with someone who has significant experience supervising fasts. 

Some people can safely fast for several weeks – 3-4 months after their initial fast, but most would be better off waiting closer to a year.  Again, each situation is different.

And again, (and I apologize if I sound like a broken record) but no one should be fasting 3 weeks (or much longer than 1 week) on their own.  It is not safe and most people are not capable of knowing when they are and are not OK.  This is a very serious process and not something to be messing around with.  And though it may seems expensive for some to fast at a fasting center, it is well worth the expensive for the dramatically better, safer, and more productive experience that most people have, at least for the first 3 or 4 fasts.

Q18. What are the best ways for one to rebuild muscle and restore one’s metabolism rate post fast?

The best way to rebuild muscle after fasting is via exercise.

Starting gradually so as not to overdo and injure oneself, one begins to exercise the entire body.  If done properly, one can usually rebuild lost muscle relatively quickly with no problem.

Metabolism is poorly understood by most, and increasing it is only desired by those that want to be able to consume more without gaining weight.  Lower metabolism means that we are more efficient machines and need less food to do the same work.  

This is what we should be striving to achieve.  By refeeding properly, we allow the body to stay as efficient as possible.

Medically Supervised Water-only Fasting in the Treatment of Hypertension

High blood pressure, also known as "hypertension," is the number one reason people visit their doctor in the United States. Each year, more than 100 million doctor visits are made for the medical management of this condition. Highblood pressure is both a sign, as well as a causal factor, in heart attacks, strokes, and congestive heart failure, which makes it the leading associated cause of death and disability in westernized societies.

Medical doctors overwhelmingly recommend drug therapy for this condition, making blood pressure drugs the number one prescriptive medication in this country. But is drug therapy the best approach? And, is it safe?

There are many popular medical myths about high blood pressure. For example, many physicians believe that high blood pressure is an "inevitable consequence of aging"; that the "only viable treatment option for high blood pressure patients is medication"; that high blood pressure patients must take their medications "for the rest of their lives"; and, worst of all, that high blood pressure medications are "safe and effective." This article will show that drug treatment is not the only viable treatment option, and that drug treatment is disturbingly dangerous. In fact, studies strongly suggest that for the majority of patients with high blood pressure, medications may be more dangerous than doing nothing at all.

Fortunately, there exist powerful diet and lifestyle treatment options that safely and effectively reduce high blood pressure. But don’t assume that your doctor will tell you about them because many doctors are simply unaware of the facts. Before exploring how to safely treat this condition, let’s look at what high blood pressure is, and seek to understand why it is our nation’s number one public health concern. In doing so, it will become clear why medical management is generally so ineffective, and why a safer, more effective approach one which takes advantage of the human body’s built-in healing mechanisms is often the best choice.

What is blood pressure?

Although high blood pressure does not cause any pain, and cannot be detected without a special device, it is clearly a serious health problem worthy of your rapt attention. But what is "blood pressure," and what can cause it to become "high"?

If you have ever been in a hot tub with the "jets" on, you have observed a circulating system. When the pump is "on," the water circulates from the hot tub, through pipes, into a pump, and then back to the hot tub. In this way, the water can be put through a filter to remove impurities, and be re-utilized, again and again. A hot tub with its pump "on" is a simple circulatory system. When the pump is "off," the water stops circulating and stays wherever it is in the system.

Your circulatory system is very much like the hot tub’s. Your blood is like the water. Your heart is like the pump, and your blood vessels are like the pipes. Your heart pumps your blood through the circulatory system in order to feed oxygen and nutrients to cells throughout your body, and to remove waste products. By circulating through the system, your blood is filtered, and re-utilized, again and again.

In a hot tub, as the water comes through the pipes it has a degree of force. This force is caused by the action of the pump, which puts energy into the circulating system and forces the water through the pipes. When the pump is off, there still may be water in the pipes, but there is no force. The degree of force in the system when the pump is on can be gauged in a number of ways, such as by putting your hand in front of a "jet." Another way would be to have a device to measure the amount of force that the water exerts against the walls of the pipes as it circulates. Such a device might yield a numerical measurement of the force, or pressure, of the water within the pipes.

Similarly, your blood exerts a force against the walls of your blood vessels as it circulates through your body. The degree of this force is called your "blood pressure," and it can be measured with a blood pressure monitoring device. Unlike the water pressure in the hot tub, however, human blood pressure is highly variable. In the hot tub, the water ejected by the jets comes in a steady, pressurized stream. But in the human circulatory system, blood pressure varies dramatically from one moment to the next.

Unlike the smooth action of the hot tub pump, the human heart expands and contracts mightily each second or so, causing your blood pressure to be comparatively high one moment, and comparatively low in the next. That is why we need two measurements when checking your blood pressure one at the moment when the pressure is highest (your systolic blood pressure), and one a moment later, when the pressure is lowest (your diastolic blood pressure).

Your systolic blood pressure is always higher than your diastolic blood pressure, and is always the "top" number when your pressure is reported. If your doctor tells you that your blood pressure is "120 over 80," this means that your systolic blood pressure was measured at "120," and your diastolic was at "80." Both your systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements are important because they indicate how well your circulatory system is working. If either of these measurements is unusually high, this warrants your serious attention. Because, as previously mentioned, elevated blood pressure may be not only a sign of cardiovascular disease, it is a cause of disease, as well.

How high is "high"?

There are really no cut-and-dried definitions for high blood pressure. Researchers have used several different criteria to determine at what level a person’s blood pressure should be considered "high." One very useful criterion is the concept that blood pressure is "high" when it reaches a level that corresponds to significantly elevated risk for heart attack, stroke, or congestive heart failure. One misguided criterion is the idea that blood pressure is "high" only when it reaches a level that can be effectively assisted by drug therapy.

Over the years, these and other criteria have been bandied about, with the final result being a set of definitions that are not based upon any specific criteria, but are still useful for communication purposes. Your blood pressure is said to be "high" when either your systolic blood pressure is 140 or above, or your diastolic blood pressure is 90 or above, or both. So if your blood pressure is found to be 142/88 (systolic = 142, diastolic = 88), you are diagnosed as having high blood pressure, according to current definitions. The same would be true if your blood pressure was found to be 135/92, or 152/95. In each case, either the systolic is high, or the diastolic is high, or both. Any of these findings results in a diagnosis of high blood pressure.

Most people who are diagnosed with high blood pressure have what is referred to as "mild" high blood pressure. This means that their systolic blood pressure is between 140-159, and/or their diastolic blood pressure is between 90-99. Only when blood pressures are above 160/100 is a patient considered to have "moderate" blood pressure, and, at even higher levels, "severe." These definitions can be quite misleading, and are undoubtedly leading to many entirely preventable tragedies.

Deadly definitions

What is considered "normal" is often pathological. For example, if a person has blood pressure of 136/88 it is considered "normal," or perhaps "high normal," based on the fact that it is below the arbitrary 140/90 numbers. But such an individual has five times the risk of stroke of a person with blood pressure at 110/70! In fact, one-third of the people who die of heart attacks, strokes, and congestive heart failure have blood pressures that are below 140/90. The current definitions of "normal" or "high normal" may give patients a false sense of security that may very well cost them their lives.

According to current classification, even a person whose blood pressure has risen to 156/98 is considered to have only "mild" high blood pressure. Yet, this level is much more dangerous than even 136/88. Sadly, the majority of people who die of heart attacks, strokes, and congestive heart failure have blood pressure described as either "normal" or "mildly high."

Problems with drugs

The current convention of diagnosing blood pressure as "high" beginning at 140/90 has created another set of problems. Most doctors have been taught that once a diagnosis of "high blood pressure" has been made, blood pressure medication is the treatment of choice. As a result, many physicians believe that the current definition of "high" blood pressure is also the same level of blood pressure at which drug treatments are worthwhile. Unfortunately, this is not the case.

In multiple studies conducted by world leaders in high blood pressure research, drug treatments have been found to be surprisingly ineffective. In fact, there is no clear evidence that drug therapy reduces the risk of death in patients with "mild" high blood pressure which is the majority of diagnosed patients! In summarizing the results of one of the largest clinical trials ever conducted performed by the prestigious British Medical Research Council it was reported that for mildly hypertensive patients, "...Active (drug) treatment had no evident effect on the overall cause of mortality...." In a subsequent review of the entire scientific literature, the British Medical Journal concluded that there is "no appreciable benefit to an individual patient from treating (with drugs) a diastolic pressure of less than 100...." What these scientists found was that while drug treatments for mild hypertension may be effective at lowering blood pressure, they were not effective in reducing overall mortality. Put more bluntly, hypertension patients in these studies died at about the same rate whether they took medication or not. These findings reaffirm an important health principle treating the symptoms of disease is not the same thing as causing health.

It also would appear that the dangerous "side effects" of high blood pressure drugs are sufficiently substantial to obliterate any positive effects of reducing mild high blood pressure in this artificial manner. In fact, the side effects of medications are sufficiently toxic that leading medical authorities suggest that medications only become worth the risks when blood pressure becomes "moderately to severely elevated" (160/100 or above). Typical side effects of high blood pressure medications range from mildly unpleasant to lethal. These include fatigue, gastric irritation, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dizziness, headache, impotence, depression, and congestive heart failure.

Don’t assume that your doctor is aware of these facts. If you are diagnosed with mild high blood pressure, you likely will be prescribed medication, instructed that it is helpful, and told that you must take it for the rest of your life. But before accepting this potentially dangerous treatment, it may be to your advantage to seek answers to the following questions: "What caused my high blood pressure?" and "Can I remove those causes and reverse this condition?"

Causes of high blood pressure

Think back for a moment to the circulatory system in a hot tub. When the system is working as designed, there is a certain level of water pressure in the system. However, we could arrange things that would increase this level of pressure. One way would be to partially clog the pipes. In this way, the pressure in the whole system would rise, just as the water pressure in your garden hose rises when you put your finger over the spout and impede the flow.

In the human circulatory system, it also is possible to "clog the pipes." By consuming a diet that is excessive in fats, cholesterol, and animal proteins, it is possible to develop atherosclerosis a condition of fatty deposits in the cardiovascular system. Over time, people can build up such significant deposits that their "pipes" are clogged up, to some degree. This is one of the main causes of high blood pressure, and is one reason why high blood pressure tends to become more prevalent as people age. But this condition is not inevitable. More encouraging still is the finding, by Dr. Dean Ornish and others, that this condition is reversible with dietary and lifestyle modifications, the first step of which is to adopt a plant-based diet derived from whole, natural foods.
While "clogging the pipes" is a major cause of high blood pressure, there are other causes, as well. A second major factor is that excessive dietary salt causes there to be too much fluid in the circulatory system. Consider once again the analogy of the garden hose. If you turn on the water "harder," there is more pressure in the hose. Excessive salt in the diet can result in excessive fluid volume in the blood, which results in elevating blood pressure. This cause, too, is reversible, as a plant-based diet of whole, natural foods devoid of added salt is naturally low in sodium chloride.

We can see that two major causes of high blood pressure atherosclerosis and excessive fluid in the circulatory system are reversible, given dietary modifications. Such modifications directly address the causes of high blood pressure, and thus might be expected to be quite effective. The curious reader might wish to know just how effective such dietary modifications are, as compared to the drug treatments offered by most doctors. A summary of results from a variety of studies on diet and lifestyle modifications, as compared with drug treatment, appears in Figure 1.



Some impressive results

As you can see in Figure 1, dietary and lifestyle modifications are very impressive as compared with drug treatment. In a study conducted by Dr. John McDougall and his colleagues, a program utilizing a moderately low-sodium, vegetarian diet with moderate exercise resulted in an average blood pressure reduction of 17/13 in just eleven days! This is particularly striking when we compare these results with medications, which have been found to reduce blood pressure only about 12/6 points, on average. This should be encouraging for those who have been told that they must take blood pressure medication for the rest of their lives.

It is notable that relaxation and meditation, though useful for many purposes, have not been found to impact high blood pressure. Many people find this surprising, possibly since high blood pressure also is known as "hypertension." Because of this potentially misleading term, many people have assumed that high levels of stress or "tension" is a major cause of "hypertension," or high blood pressure. This is not the case. High blood pressure is an essentially mechanical, and not psychological, problem. The causes are most often some combination of clogged "pipes" and excessive salt in the diet. Lifestyle changes, such as appropriate diet and exercise, are among the most effective treatment strategies. Relaxation, meditation, and otherwise "taking it easy" are not effective solutions as valuable as such strategies may be for your psychological well-being.

As you examine Figure 1, you may observe that the real key to the treatment of high blood pressure is to practice a diversity of health-promoting behaviors. By avoiding alcohol use, stopping smoking, switching to a high-fiber, low-sodium, vegan-vegetarian diet, and engaging in moderate, regular exercise, the problem of high blood pressure usually will eliminate itself. However, as alluded to in the beginning of this article, high blood pressure is not only a sign of distress in your cardiovascular system, but also a cause.

If your blood pressure is elevated above what is normal and healthy for our species, the pressure itself causes damage to arterial walls of your circulatory system which can facilitate the build-up of atherosclerosis and, thus, exacerbate the high blood pressure condition itself. For this reason, it can be useful to reduce high blood pressure as quickly as possible, rather than to patiently wait for the often moderate healing pace of healthful lifestyle changes.

Fast way back to health

Is there a safe and effective way to rapidly normalize blood pressure? Indeed there is, and the results of this method represent nothing less than a breakthrough in the treatment of this condition. The power of this method is hinted at in Figure 1 the method referred to as Treatment F.

As you can see from Figure 1, there is one treatment option that significantly outperforms all others labeled Treatment F. Treatment F is not a new drug treatment. Neither is it a new, expensive, and patented dietary supplement. It is supervised water-only fasting, a technique that allows for the induction of a potent, natural, adaptive, healing process in a professionally monitored environment. This technique is known to surprisingly few health professionals, though it has proved valuable in the treatment of a wide variety of health problems. Recently, this powerful technique has been shown to be an extremely effective method for allowing the body to rapidly normalize high blood pressure more effectively than any other treatment reported in the scientific literature.

It may seem incredible to many that supervised water-only fasting can obtain such impressive results. In fact, most people, including most doctors, simply will not believe that such a simple procedure can be so powerful. Few suspect that the body is so capable of healing itself in this way. For this reason, Dr. Alan Goldhamer and his colleagues at the Center for Conservative Therapy set out to carefully document the effectiveness of supervised water-only fasting, and to report the results to the scientific community in a way that other doctors might find convincing. In order to assist him in this task, Dr. Goldhamer and his research staff at the Center sought the help of one of the world’s leading nutritional biochemists, Professor T. Colin Campbell of Cornell University.

Fortunately, Dr. Campbell and his statistical expert, Dr. Banoo Parpia, were enthusiastic about joining the research effort. This collaboration has resulted in one of the most remarkable studies in the treatment of hypertension ever conducted. The results will appear in the article, "Medically Supervised Water-Only Fasting in the Treatment of Hypertension," scheduled for publication in early 2001 in the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics.

Powerful findings

In the study, funded in part by a grant from the ANHS-National Health Association, it was discovered that by having patients consume nothing but pure water in a supervised environment of complete rest, blood pressures rapidly normalized. In fact, many patients who began their fasts while on high blood pressure drugs were required to quickly discontinue their medications, so that their blood pressures would not drop artificially low!

Over a twelve-year period, 174 patients diagnosed with mild to severe high blood pressure were seen at the Center for Conservative Therapy, and were placed on a medically-supervised, water-only fasting regime. The treatment procedure included an average water-only fasting period of 10.6 days, followed by a supervised refeeding period of about one week with a whole, natural foods diet. The results of the study are summarized in Figure 2.


In the final analysis, this safe and simple procedure demonstrated extraordinary effectiveness. By the end of their stay, all patients were able to discontinue their medications, no matter how severe their initial condition. In fact, a review of Figure 2 indicates that the most impressive results were observed with the most serious cases. In cases of "moderate" to "severe" hypertension (blood pressures of 174/93 or greater), the average reduction at the conclusion of treatment was a remarkable 46/15! For these cases, which medical practitioners generally would insist need lifetime medical intervention, the average exit blood pressure was 128/78 using no medication whatsoever!

The reasons for this astonishing success are not yet entirely understood. Certainly, two of the major causes of high blood pressure are being addressed: excessive dietary salt is completely eliminated, and it is likely that some patients experience some reversal of the atherosclerosis process. However, Dr. Campbell has suggested that additional mechanisms may be partly responsible for fasting’s remarkable effects such as the rapid reduction of a phenomenon known as "insulin resistance."

Though the details are incompletely understood, the clinical results are clear and convincing. Water-only fasting represents an astonishing breakthrough in the treatment of high blood pressure, with the only "side effects" being that people lose weight and feel great.

For the rest of your life

Contrary to what many people have been led to believe, high blood pressure is not a condition that requires patients to take drugs for the rest of their lives. If you suffer from this silent but serious condition, start taking effective actions today. As described above, there are many things that you can do to assist your body in regaining a healthy level of blood pressure. In particular, the first thing to do is to adopt a diet consisting of whole, natural foods such as fresh fruits and vegetables, whole grains and legumes, and the variable addition of nuts and seeds. Remember, the optimal diet excludes any added salt, since it is a particularly troubling component of the high blood pressure problem. In addition, this diet has been shown to aid in the reversal of atherosclerosis, and in weight reduction. Other important factors that will help to normalize blood pressure include regular exercise and the elimination of alcohol and tobacco. When followed diligently, such a combined strategy is likely to be very effective.

For those who wish to address their high blood pressure problem quickly, powerfully, and safely, supervised water-only fasting has been shown to be a safe and effective tool for the rapid normalization of blood pressure. Follow-up data from the Center for Conservative Therapy study has shown that after several months, patients who adhere to a healthful dietary regimen are able to sustain their improvements. In addition, water-only fasting is a useful method for helping people to re-educate their palates. This can make it easier for you to fully enjoy a simpler, more health-promoting diet and the benefits of vibrant, unmedicated, health for the rest of your life.

More about the study

The fasting and high blood pressure study described in this article was funded in part by a grant from the ANHS-National Health Association. It was conducted at the Center for Conservative Therapy in Penngrove, Calif. The results will appear in the article, "Medically Supervised Water-Only Fasting in the Treatment of Hypertension," which is scheduled for publication in early 2001 in the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics.